Source https://source.aacei.org Source Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:27:09 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 https://source.aacei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/AACE-Site-Icon.gif Source https://source.aacei.org 32 32 New RP 127R-23: Choosing Among Strategic Alternatives Using Branching Concepts in Decision Modeling https://source.aacei.org/2024/04/24/new-rp-127r-23-choosing-among-strategic-alternatives-using-branching-concepts-in-decision-modeling/ https://source.aacei.org/2024/04/24/new-rp-127r-23-choosing-among-strategic-alternatives-using-branching-concepts-in-decision-modeling/#respond Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:54:09 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=9270

New RP - 127R-23: Choosing Among Strategic Alternatives Using Branching Concepts in Decision Modeling

RP 127R-23: Choosing Among Strategic Alternatives Using Branching Concepts in Decision Modeling

The purpose of this recommended practice (RP) is to describe risk analysis concepts that can be used when important alternative selection strategies are being developed by senior leaders. These selections are made well before there is a detailed project plan, schedule, and cost estimate. The RP describes the development of simplified models to assess alternatives under consideration. These models highlight key systemic and project-specific risk characteristics. They provide clarity, transparency, traceability, and repeatability consistent with recommended project risk analysis practices. Models are presented here to illustrate two of these methods, probabilistic branching and conditional branching.

During the “Select” phase 1 for any significant project, strategic alternatives are being evaluated, and one of the main considerations will include the balance of risk driving any alternative. This recommended practice (RP) addresses decision modeling using quantified risk analysis methods to conduct an analysis of alternatives (AoA). The model is simplified to highlight the key risks and feasible alternative configurations, to select the best alternative. This RP document is not intended to be a standard. Rather it is intended to provide a guideline for using project risk analysis simulation capabilities of probabilistic and conditional branching to evaluate alternative selection within a simplified model framework of the project’s strategy. RPs are considered by most practitioners to be good processes that can be relied on and that they would recommend be considered for use where applicable. The RP will be useful to organizational leaders and decision-makers, project management, and risk team leaders.

Contributors:

Keith D. Hornbacher (Primary Contributor)
Dr. David T. Hulett, FAACE (Primary Contributor)
James E. Arrow, DRMP
Jessica M. Colbert, PRMP PSP
Francisco Cruz, PE CCP
Larry R. Dysert, CCP CEP DRMP FAACE Hon. Life
John K. Hollmann, PE CCP CEP DRMP FAACE Hon. Life
Sagar B. Khadka, CCP DRMP PSP FAACE
Dr. Luis Henrique Martinez
Dr. Dan Melamed, CCP EVP FAACE
Abbas Shakourifar, PSP
Lance Stephenson, CCP FAACE Hon. Life

About Keith:

Keith D. Hornbacher is the founder and Principal Consultant of Hornbacher & Associates. His firm’s program/project risk management practice includes clients across industries and domains that include capital expansion projects in water management, energy, engineering, construction, transportation infrastructure, and aerospace/defense systems development. For over 35 years, Keith has implemented quantitative schedule, cost, and integrated cost-schedule risk analysis in the public and private sectors.

As a senior third-party risk analysis and planning specialist, Mr. Hornbacher has held several project risk management and control positions. For Raytheon, an aerospace and defense company, he was a Program Risk Manager on the U.S. FAA’s Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), a NextGen air traffic management system. Also, his firm lead the program/project risk assessments of a major metropolitan water bureau filtration and pipeline system upgrade.  In addition to his role as a senior consultant, Mr. Hornbacher recently celebrated the conclusion of more than fifteen years as an affiliated faculty member in organizational dynamics graduate studies at the University of Pennsylvania, where he presented seminars and clinics on managing project risk, uncertainty, and the unexpected. Graduate students learned how to utilize best-in-class quantitative risk analysis tools and methods in his clinics. You may reach Keith at: Keith@HornbacherAssociates.com

About David:

Dr. David T. Hulett, FAACE is a Principal with Hulett & Associates, LLC, and has focused for the last 28 years on quantitative schedule risk analysis, integrated cost-schedule risk analysis, and project scheduling best practices. He has conducted many risk analyses, focusing on quantifying the risks and their implications for project cost and schedule, and many schedule assessments.

David has held strategic planning positions at TOSCO, an oil company, and at TRW in aerospace and defense. In the federal government, he managed offices in the Federal Energy Agency (FEA), the Department of Energy (DOE), and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). He was an economist with the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Dr. Hulett was also an Instructor in the Economics Department at Harvard University.

Dr. Hulett is a contributor to 11 recommended practices, with three as the primary contributor. He has authored two books, Practical Schedule Risk Analysis and Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis, as well as numerous articles for AACE.  David is a frequent presenter at AACE’s annual conference and expo, and the current Vice-Chair of the Decision and Risk Management Technical Subcommittee.

Dr. Hulett was elected as a Fellow of AACE International in 2015 and received the Brian D. Dunfield Educational Service Award from the Association in 2018. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Stanford University. You may reach David at: david.hulett@projectrisk.com

This new RP may be found here: RP 127R-23: Choosing Among Strategic Alternatives Using Branching Concepts in Decision Modeling

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2024/04/24/new-rp-127r-23-choosing-among-strategic-alternatives-using-branching-concepts-in-decision-modeling/feed/ 0
Vera Anna Lovejoy Obituary https://source.aacei.org/2024/04/18/vera-anna-lovejoy-obituary/ https://source.aacei.org/2024/04/18/vera-anna-lovejoy-obituary/#respond Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:38:50 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=9236

Vera Anna Lovejoy Obituary

Vera Anna Lovejoy

Vera Anna Lovejoy, beloved wife, sister, and mother, passed away peacefully on March 14, 2024, in Los Angeles, California, in the company of her loving family. She was 62 years old.

Born in Toronto, Ontario, Vera’s family moved to Los Angeles when she was a child. She dedicated over 30 years of her life to the engineering field, leaving an indelible mark on numerous projects, including the expansion of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and the development of California’s high-speed rail system.

Vera’s professional accomplishments were matched only by her unwavering dedication to her family. She is survived by her devoted husband, Dave; cherished sister, Mirna; and loving sons, David and Christopher. Vera’s warmth, kindness, and strength will be deeply missed by all who knew her.

In lieu of flowers, the family requests that donations be made to The Malala Fund at malala.org, in honor of Vera’s lifelong commitment to dismantling the patriarchy.

She became an AACE International member in 1999. She earned the CCP (then CCC) in 2002, and by unanimous request of the PSP Task Force, of which she was co-chair while working full time in the field, a mom of two teenagers, a full-time college student, and very privately battling breast cancer, she was granted PSP #00001.

Vera receiving the Charles V. Keane Distinguished Service Award in 2005.

From AACE International, she received several association awards, including:

  • Charles V. Keane Distinguished Service Award (2005)
  • Technical Excellence Award (2004)
  • AACE Fellow (2013)
  • CH2M Hill Service Award (1996)

Vera was an active member of AACE International. Her volunteer service included:

  • Board of Directors – Vice President Technical/Education/Certification (2007-2009) and Regional Director Region 6 (2005-2007)
  • Technical Board member from August 31, 2016, through January 2, 2019
  • PSP Task Force co-chair (2003-2004) – the PSP was the first specialty certification…and AACE’s first certification in 27 years when they formed the PSP task force. When they were giving the first beta test of the PSP, she had copies of the exam and the flight she was supposed to take after getting off work was canceled. To protect the integrity of the exam, plus since she wanted to be part of the post-exam interviews with the examinees, she and her husband drove all night from the LA area to Phoenix.
  • Planning & Scheduling (P&S) Committee Chair – 2003
  • Contributor to five AACE International Recommended Practices
  • Women in Project Control (WPC) officer – 2006 (when the committee was founded) until at least 2009
  • She frequently held PSP Certification Review Workshops and presented papers at the Conference & Expo (then known as the AACE Annual Meeting)

AACE International Rememberances

Several AACE International members have commented on knowing Vera while she was an AACE member. These comments include:

From: Charles E. Bolyard, Jr., CCM, FCMAA, PSP, CFCC, FAACE, Hon. Life

“Good morning. So very sad to learn of the loss of Vera Lovejoy. Vera was a career-long supporter and active participant in AACE and will surely be missed.”

Best Regards,

Charles E. Bolyard, Jr., CCM, FCMAA, PSP, CFCC, FAACE, Hon. Life
Founder MBP
2600 Park Tower Drive, Suite 801
Vienna, VA 22180

From: Edward E. “Ted” Douglas III, CCP, PSP, FAACE

“I first met Vera Lovejoy at the AACE Headquarters in Morgantown WV, when we were participating in the beta testing for the Planning and Scheduling Professional Certification. She was a dedicated and focused champion for professional excellence. Vera and the PSP Taskforce created a comprehensive certification product that has helped develop literally thousands of professionals, both within and outside of AACE International. Vera’s commitment to professional development helped focus my subsequent efforts to help provide recommended practices and guidelines for that continued goal. Vera was a professional associate that I was honored to also call a friend. You are missed Vera.”

Edward E “Ted” Douglas III
ACTPMA, LLC
Wading River, NY 11792-1240

From: Larry R. Dysert, CCP, CEP, DRMP, FAACE, Hon. Life

“I remember Vera as a cherished colleague on the Technical Board of AACE. Her passion and dedication to furthering the cost engineering profession left an indelible mark on those privileged to work with her. I appreciate my time working alongside Vera on the Technical Board. She will be missed by all who knew her.”

Larry R. Dysert, CCP, CEP, DRMP, FAACE, Hon. Life
Lake Havasu City, AZ 86406-6354

From: Donald F. McDonald Jr.

“A few thoughts on Vera: Vera was a quiet but effective force for advancing all things cost engineering in general and women in the profession specifically.  I first came to know Vera when I was working in Southern California and when she was active in the development and promotion of AACE Recommended practices, the PSP Certification Study Guide, and other Education Board publications.  When I was Education Board Chair, Vera, as VP-Tech, was a passionate supporter of the Ed Board and made our work that much easier to accomplish.  When Vera talked, one learned to pay close attention to the gems she was passionate about.”

Best regards,

Donald F. McDonald, Jr.
Vice President
Fluor Enterprises Inc.
100 Fluor Daniel Dr.
Greenville, SC 29607-2761  

From: Michael R. Nosbisch, CCP PSP FAACE

“A sad day for sure–I would add the following: Along with Mike Ray, Vera was the driving force behind the PSP certification, co-chairing the task force that created and established AACE’s first specialty certification, successfully setting the stage for all the others that followed.  I was also lucky enough to work alongside her for a few years at the Parsons Corporation, where she was instrumental in the development and roll-out of an internal project controls management certification program that was cutting edge at the time, stressing the fact that project controls is an integral component of any project leadership team.  Her passion for excellence will be missed by everyone who was lucky enough to know and work with her.” 

Michael R. Nosbisch, CCP PSP FAACE
Director, Project Controls Consulting Services
3780 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 200
Long Beach, CA 90806

Editor’s Note: The Vera Lovejoy obituary includes information provided by her family, supplemented with AACE International information gathered by Jennie Amos, Director of Governance, Marketing, and Meetings, and Christian Heller, Director of Technical Guidance.

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2024/04/18/vera-anna-lovejoy-obituary/feed/ 0
AACE 2024 Election Results Announced https://source.aacei.org/2024/04/05/aace-2024-election-results-announced/ https://source.aacei.org/2024/04/05/aace-2024-election-results-announced/#respond Fri, 05 Apr 2024 15:44:50 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=9202

AACE 2024 Election Results Announced

Results from this year’s annual AACE International Board of Directors election for President-Elect, Treasurer, and Director-At-Large are announced. Voting ended on March 31.

The Winners Are:

AACE International Board of Directors:

  • President-Elect: Michael J. Bennink, PE CCP PSP
  • Treasurer: Cindy L. Hands, P.Eng. CCP
  • Director-At-Large: Omoniyi (Niyi) Ladipo, CCP EVP

Michael J. Bennink, PE CCP PSP

President-Elect

Michael was elected President-Elect. This is a three-year commitment, serving 2024-2025 as President-Elect, 2025-2026 as President, and 2026-2027 as Past President.

Biography

Michael joined AACE in 2002 and became involved through the New Jersey Section. After several roles on the NJ Section Board (learning about AACE!), he was elected section president in 2008 for three terms and again in 2013 for seven terms. In 2019, he served on the NE Symposium Committee and was elected Region 2 Director in 2020, where he was then chair of the 2022 Northeast Symposium. Over these years, he also served on the Certification Board, presented at sections, regionally, and at the annual Conference & Expos, and achieved CCP and PSP certifications.

He was given the opportunity to serve on the Board of Directors in 2022 when he was elected Director-at-Large, where he learned of the challenging work that has been accomplished, including developing the AACE strategic plan that continues to be implemented. Through all his AACE involvement, the people he met have been the highlight of his experience.

Outside of AACE, Michael graduated from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (NY) in mechanical engineering and has an MBA from Monmouth University (NJ). He started his career as a gas utility engineer and has been a consultant in construction claims and disputes for the past 20 years. He is a managing director for J.S. Held in New York City. He is also a licensed Professional Engineer and certified PMP, a past board member of the NJ Society of Professional Engineers, serving a term as president, and a long-time coach and chief umpire of his local Little League baseball organization. 

Goals/Objectives

If elected, he will champion AACE’s lead as the premier professional society, ensure continued implementation of its strategic plan, and support the tremendous contributions and efforts from its boards, committees, sections, headquarters staff, and all its members. He wants to ensure members get opportunities through the continued growth and purpose of the organization, which cannot be taken for granted. Specifically,

  • Support AACE members’ professional and technical development and encourage and enable opportunities within the Association.
  • Continue support to sections and headquarters during the ongoing section organizational transition, including working through the diverse challenges each section faces.
  • Facilitate the worldwide growth of AACE, recognizing and addressing challenges, like language and economic considerations, faced by members and sections.
  • Promote certifications and the elevation of credentials within industry and government.

Continue to advance recommended practices and the abundant outstanding technical resources AACE members have developed.

 

Cindy L. Hands, P.Eng. CCP

Treasurer

Biography

  • Project controls manager with 30 years of experience in the infrastructure, oil and gas, mining, energy, and construction industries.
  • Supports mega projects worldwide and works with world-class international construction contractors.
  • Has been project controls manager for major EPCM firms, overseeing project controls teams across North America.
  • Currently an associate with Hatch Ltd. (18 years).
  • Civil Engineering degree from Memorial University, master’s degree in leadership, Certified Cost Professional (AACE CCP), Professional Engineer and Responsible Member (APEGGA, Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta).
  • In addition to a technical engineering background, has extensive knowledge of project planning and delivery, estimate development, cost management, scheduling, progress measurement, and status reporting.
  • Has a passion for project controls, active in the local Calgary-Chinook Section of AACE since 2001.
  • 2014-2016: President of AACE Canada (Regional Director 1), overseeing 10+ Canadian sections and serving on the International AACE Board.
  • 2020-2021: VP Membership, North America, AACE International Board.
  • 2021–2022: Membership Advisory Committee (MAC) Chair, North America, AACE International Board.
  • 2022-2024: Treasurer, AACE International Board and the AACE Certification Institute Board.
  • Collaborates with industry professionals and university professors to provide training in project controls and AACE certification training across North America (3Targets.com).
  • A mom of two active teenage boys.

 Goals/Objectives

  • As this would be her second term as treasurer, she wants to continue to oversee the organization’s financial operations.
  • Ensure budgeting and spending align with the association’s strategic plan.
  • Participate in financial reviews/audits.
  • Ensure compliance and offer recommendations as appropriate.
  • Seek board approval on financial matters.
  • Continue to support the growth and evolution of the association.

 

Omoniyi (Niyi) Ladipo, CCP EVP

Director-At-Large

Biography

Niyi graduated from the University of Maryland, College Park, with a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering in 1984. Later, she earned a Master of Science in Construction Management and Economics in 1994 from the University of Greenwich, United Kingdom. She has over 35 years of US and overseas experience in construction and construction management. Over the last 19 years, she has been employed with MBP. She serves as vice president and service executive within the Consulting Practice Line.

She has been an active member of AACE since 2005 and has served as National Capital Section secretary, president, chair for scholarships and college outreach, and board member. She has also been actively involved with the Region 2 Symposium, serving as the Region 2 Director, a member of the AACE Marketing Advisory Committee, and a member of the Ethics Committee at the association level.

She has authored papers and presented at AACE Conference & Expo meetings, at AACE Region 2 Symposia, and at other professional association conferences on topics related to cost management, earned value management and schedule reviews in construction, and cost engineering successes and solutions. She has also authored a chapter in the Construction Law Update on earned value management.

 Goals/Objectives

  • Will work closely with others on the Board of Directors to uphold and promote the mission and vision of our association.
  • Will support and collaborate with others on the Board of Directors to execute assignments at the President and Board of Directors’ request to govern AACE successfully.
  • Will support the Board of Directors in improvement and outreach initiatives to grow and sustain our AACE membership through the goals and objectives established by the Board.
  • Upon direction by the Board of Directors, she will work with others on the policies and procedures related to governing and executing our association’s business.

 

 

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2024/04/05/aace-2024-election-results-announced/feed/ 0
New Member Profile: Marco Ciasullo https://source.aacei.org/2024/02/21/new-member-profile-marco-ciasullo/ https://source.aacei.org/2024/02/21/new-member-profile-marco-ciasullo/#comments Wed, 21 Feb 2024 06:00:00 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=9172

Meet Marco Ciasullo

Where are you from, and where did you go to school?

I am originally from Sedico, a little town in the Italian Dolomites between Venice and the ski town Cortina D’Ampezzo. Due to sports (I used to play soccer professionally), studies, and then work, I have not lived there anymore since I was 15 years old. I have a master’s degree in civil engineering, specializing in infrastructure, from the University of Trento (a city in northern Italy).

What’s something about you (a fun fact) that not many people know?

I grew up in the Dolomites doing lots of trekking and climbing. Unfortunately, for one reason or another, I could only do my first proper Himalayan trek (I have been based in Nepal since 2016) a few months ago. I was becoming a joke among my friends in my hometown…

Where do you work?

After graduating from the university, I moved to Australia for two years and then to work in China, where I worked for four years. I have been based in Nepal for the last seven years, but I am currently traveling for work in Indonesia and Ethiopia. I started on tunneling and hydropower projects on the contractor’s side and, in the last three years, switched to the consulting sector. I mainly consulted for an Italian engineering company called ELC Electroconsult, based in Milan, on feasibility studies, detailed design, and construction supervision of hydropower, geothermal, and HV transmission lines projects. 

What do you love most about your job?

The opportunity to travel, meet, and discover other people, experts, various and different cultures, and obviously, always new challenges to face and try to overcome. 

Do you have a project story to share?

It’s unrelated to cost estimation, but I still remember it: during a dispute board session, the board chairman said, “Cash flow is the lifeblood of the construction industries” and “No matter what, fairness and good communication between all the parties.” Nothing is truer. I’ve seen this a few times in my short experience from both the contractor and the engineer supervision sides. There is always a belief that the other party is there to cheat you, which starts the contract with prejudice. Clients and supervising engineers “cut” and delay payments, sometimes for no valid reason, with the idea that keeping the contractor right is a good situation. Also, contractors are trying to cut corners to increase their profits, only because maybe they lowered the economic proposal to get the work. Ultimately, every party has the same goal: positively completing the project. So, they should work together toward that goal, not in opposition, via constructive communication, fairness, and good faith. I have since made these two sentences which I heard from this chairman as my motto. 

What are your future goals and aspirations for your career? Did someone inspire you to be on this career path?

My future goal and aspirations are to increase my knowledge and experience in cost estimating, budgeting, and risk management to improve the chances of project cost under-run. At the same time, I am getting more involved in the AACE activities. But then, you never know; nowadays, everyone has two or three careers in one lifetime. Surely, what you have learned and acquired will always be with you, widening your opportunities and skill sets. 

Who inspired me? I think it was my grandfather. He started a construction company and then passed it down to my uncle when he retired. I worked there during my university studies and always went with him to see the sites. I still do this with my uncle when I return to my hometown. I believe my love for construction started there when I was 10-12 years old: the wonder I felt touching and seeing the structure coming up and getting completed, after all the efforts, from an empty field, was an amazing incentive to get things done.

What is the biggest career challenge you’ve had to overcome? What’s been your favorite or most memorable moment of your career?

At the beginning of my work experience in the construction sector, I was lucky that the company I worked for trusted me to be the resident project manager of a whole project (25km of tunnel by TBM) in China. I was in charge of the work planning and execution, dealing with the clients, vendors, and the project team. I had to learn quickly by making mistakes. It was two and a half years of hard work where I learned a lot. Full of stress but at the same time memorable moments, one of which was the tunnel breakthrough. 

Why did you join AACE?

I have spent over 15 years working in construction companies, mainly focusing on contract and project management, particularly regarding budget, cost control, change of order management, and tender preparation. In the last three years, I have been a consultant to an engineering company, focusing on project cost estimates and associated risks in hydropower and HV transmission lines. One day, one of my colleagues mentioned AACE. I have to say, in the beginning, I was a bit skeptical, but once I became a member, I understood the full potential, benefits, and knowledge sharing that has exponentially improved my understanding and capability to deal with such a vast topic properly. I still have a long way to go, and I am super enthusiastic. 

What do you like most about being an AACE member? Or what’s your favorite part of being an AACE member?

I cannot say much as I became a member only recently. Yet, besides obviously the huge material and knowledge sharing with all the PGD and RPs, I hope to get more involved with my section and other activities and people connections that the AACE world brings soon. 

What advice would you give to someone who wants to enter the field?

Go for it. You can interface with lots of different experts and widen your knowledge on a wide variety of topics. 

The day of the TBM launch in one project in China.

Climbing in the Dolomites.

During my first trek in the Himalaya region (Kanchenjunga Conservation Area).

My little rescued kitten.

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2024/02/21/new-member-profile-marco-ciasullo/feed/ 1
How a Student Internship Led to a Fulfilling and Successful Career in Project Controls https://source.aacei.org/2024/02/13/how-a-student-internship-led-to-a-fulfilling-and-successful-career-in-project-controls/ https://source.aacei.org/2024/02/13/how-a-student-internship-led-to-a-fulfilling-and-successful-career-in-project-controls/#respond Tue, 13 Feb 2024 06:00:00 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=9144

How a Student Internship Led to a Fulfilling and Successful Career in Project Controls

Meet Nishadi Perera, EVP PSP

In a recent interview, we spoke with Nishadi Perera, a Vice President at K2 Consulting and a professional in project controls. Nishadi shared her experience and insights about her career path and involvement in the project controls community. With a background in civil engineering and engineering management, Nishadi’s journey into project controls was somewhat unexpected.

Hi Nishadi!  Please begin by telling us about your education and where you thought that path would initially take you.

I attended The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., where I pursued undergraduate and master’s degrees. My undergraduate degree was in civil engineering, and my master’s degree was in engineering management, focusing on construction management. I’ll admit that I never imagined myself working in the construction industry. However, an unexpected summer internship with a general contractor soon changed my perspective.

Your story is very relatable. Project Controls often isn’t the primary field of practice for many of us.  Tell us more about this experience and how it gave you hands-on construction management experience.

I recognize that many professionals in this field often come from diverse backgrounds, such as engineering or construction, rather than specifically aiming for project controls. My personal story is a testament to this, as my journey into project controls was not a deliberate choice but rather an unexpected path I stumbled upon.

The internship was a requirement of my curriculum, and initially I saw it as a temporary experience. However, I quickly discovered my passion for the field while working on various projects.

After my successful internship, I realized that construction and project management had captured my interest. Seeing how different elements come together to create large-scale projects was fascinating. I decided to pursue a career in project controls, as it combined my passion for engineering with my newfound interest in project management. I continued working there through my senior year and then through my master’s. 

It sounds like this internship gave you a leap into the construction world; where did it lead you next?

My internship was on site at the International Monetary Fund Headquarters 2 building in Washington, DC.  After graduation, I continued as an office engineer, then a project engineer, and ultimately got into project scheduling.  The scheduling team was looking for people, and a senior colleague suggested that I might benefit from a rotation through the scheduling department.  Scheduling was not a popular choice among my peers at the time, but I realized that I liked gaining visibility into the entire project and understanding the details and logic on how a project is built.

I was the onsite scheduler for the Johns Hopkins Hospital New Clinical Building in Baltimore, Maryland, managing the schedule during construction.  It was at this point that I decided I really liked the scheduling world and wanted to learn more.  That’s when I jumped into the consulting side. I started consulting and have been doing this for 13 years!

Amazing!  It’s wonderful to hear that your career in project controls has been such a positive experience for you. 

I love it.  I love the challenge.  I went from working on one project for three and a half years to now doing 100+ projects for many different clients in a year.  There is always something different every day, and I truly enjoy the variety of my work.  I have the opportunity to wear many different hats and see perspectives from different people, and I get to use that knowledge to help our clients.

Your career and role today as VP at K2 has given you many growth opportunities.

I was very nervous about leaving a large, well-known company, but I’m so glad I made that leap because K2 was a better fit for me and a great decision for my career.  We support clients, owners, and contractors on various projects and provide project management and project controls services, systems integration, and deployment of complex security solutions. My role started out as a scheduler, and then I worked my way up to senior scheduler and scheduling manager. 

Now, I oversee the operations for our critical path controls division, which includes scheduling, claims, process improvements, analytics, virtual design and construction and earned value management systems.  We’ve expanded along the way, and I’ve been fortunate to have leaders who believe in my ability and capability and have allowed me to challenge myself and grow.  It was hard work, and I had to put in a lot of blood, sweat, and even some tears, but they continuously pushed me out of my comfort zone while always supporting me when needed.  That trust and support have allowed me to come out of my shell and given me the confidence to take on any challenge. 

It is wonderful to hear that this has been your experience, especially now that you are in a leadership position and know how to guide others through their own career growth.

My experience has been very supportive.  I’ve learned from different leaders, taken what I admired about their leadership styles, and tried to make it my own.  Hopefully, it will allow me to be a better manager and leader, and I will try to be mindful and conscientious of what my team is going through and how I can help them.  We have a phenomenal team, and I want them to feel supported, challenged, and excited when they come to work every day. 

There are always challenges, particularly with projects.  When our clients bring us on, it is because they need help.  Project teams have so much on their plate; our job is to make their lives easier, provide expert advice, and help them solve their problems.  When we focus on these priorities, the result is that we have established amazing long-term relationships with our clients.  K2 has been in business for 33 years, and we are still working for our first customer! 

Tell us more about what led you to join AACE Women in Project Controls Committee.

Previously, when I worked for a large general contractor, I saw the establishment and growth of a women’s group within the company. This experience gave me a glimpse of the positive impact such communities can have on individuals and the professional environment. I also had the opportunity to attend the Women in Construction Conference in DC several times. 

When the opportunity to join the AACE WPC Committee arose, I saw it as a natural fit. My boss, Michael Marcell, Chair of AACE’s Earned Value Management Subcommittee, forwarded an email seeking volunteers for the community, and I saw it as an excellent opportunity to further engage in my field of interest. I confess that I’m not a natural extrovert, but I recognize the importance of networking and building relationships within my industry.

When I reflect on my journey to where I am today, I feel excited about being part of the project controls community.  I especially value the importance of finding like-minded individuals, particularly other women in the field, who share similar experiences and challenges.  Discovering a community of women in similar roles has been a valuable and empowering experience.

Nishadi’s story serves as an inspiration for those who may find themselves in a similar situation. She proves that taking advantage of opportunities and embracing unexpected experiences can lead to exciting and fulfilling career paths. Today, Nishadi is an accomplished professional in project controls, and she continues to contribute to the community by sharing her knowledge and learning from others.

As we concluded our interview, Nishadi expressed her enthusiasm for the future of her career in project controls. She looks forward to the community’s continued growth and the opportunity to connect with more inspiring individuals. Nishadi’s journey highlights the importance of finding passion in unexpected places and the value of building communities that support and empower professionals in their chosen fields.

 

 

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2024/02/13/how-a-student-internship-led-to-a-fulfilling-and-successful-career-in-project-controls/feed/ 0
February 2024 President’s Message https://source.aacei.org/2024/02/01/february-2024-presidents-message/ https://source.aacei.org/2024/02/01/february-2024-presidents-message/#comments Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:29:42 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=9121

Patrick Kelly, PE PSP
AACE International President 2023-2024

February 2024 President’s Message

2023 Growth Showcases an Expanding Influence and Appeal of AACE International

Dear Esteemed Members of AACE,

I trust this message finds you well and thriving in your respective endeavors. It is with immense gratitude that I am able to share with you, on behalf of your Board of Directors, the latest updates on the outstanding performance of AACE International. The gains made over the past year are directly attributable to your dedication and contributions, which have been instrumental in propelling us to new heights, and to the continued diligent service of our excellent AACE Headquarters staff, led by Executive Director Deb Lally. I am thrilled to report on the remarkable progress we’ve achieved together in the past year.

First, I am delighted to announce that our membership has experienced a substantial increase, reaching 9,043 members at the close of 2023, up from 8,324 in 2022. This represents an impressive 8% growth in the last year and continues with the trends from previous years. Furthermore, the influx of fresh perspectives and energy has been a driving force behind our success. I am pleased to report that our new members have surged by an impressive 31%. And the growth has been worldwide, as evidenced by the 10% increase in non-North American members. Such growth showcases the expanding influence and appeal of our organization.

At the corporate level, AACE’s impact has reached an unprecedented high, with organizational memberships increasing by 10%, and this includes a corresponding 10% rise in non-North American organizational memberships. This milestone reflects the growing recognition and trust that other organizations place in our collective efforts.

AACE’s certifications continue to gain ground in our industries. The total number of certificants has reached an all-time high of 3,917, marking a 2% increase. Our reach extends globally, with a significant 15% increase in non-North American certificant applicants. Additionally, certificants with multiple certifications have also grown by 2%, showcasing the proficiency and dedication within our community. This surge reflects the international recognition and desirability of AACE certifications.

These achievements are a testament to the collective dedication, passion, and hard work of each member of the AACE community. As we celebrate these milestones, let us renew our commitment to making a positive impact and continue working together towards our shared goal: to be the gathering place and source of thought leadership for professionals who drive successful project and program delivery.

Thank you for your continued support and for being an integral part of the AACE community.

Warm regards,

Patrick M. Kelly, PE PSP

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2024/02/01/february-2024-presidents-message/feed/ 1
Part 4 – Six Elements of Project Controls – Competency and Level of Effort https://source.aacei.org/2024/01/22/part-4-six-elements-of-project-controls-competency-and-level-of-effort/ https://source.aacei.org/2024/01/22/part-4-six-elements-of-project-controls-competency-and-level-of-effort/#respond Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:14:09 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=9063

Part 4 – Six Elements of Project Controls –
Competency and Level of Effort

By Lance Stephenson, CCP FAACE

Lance Stephenson, CCP FAACE, is a contributing member of AACE’s Technical Board and is a Certified Cost Professional. Lance has provided direction in the areas of organizational design, process improvements, auditing, maturity assessments, and the development and implementation for improved capital portfolio and project effectiveness. He is a senior leader and manager with over 35 years of experience in the operational, capital portfolio, and project delivery environment and is currently the Director of Operations for AECOM.

This article is the fourth in the series on the Six Elements of Project Controls. Past articles included the basics of the six elements of project controls, the effect of quality, and the maturity required. Today’s article discusses the competency and level of effort required to manage these elements of project controls. As discussed in the earlier articles, the six elements of project controls are considered the operational steps for managing the functional project controls requirements within a project. The six elements include the following:

 

It is not enough for a project organization to just know about these elements, their expected quality, and maturity requirements to make their project successful. Two other ingredients to apply for success are competency and level of effort. Competency is the possession of sufficient knowledge or skill, while the level of effort is the amount of work needed to execute the project’s activities. For an organization, competencies are core masteries that define what, who, and how the organization will deploy its employees to accomplish its overall goals. The level of effort defines the intensity (scale) and when deliverables need to be completed. Based on these expectations, the organization and its employees must provide the necessary competency and effort to complete the defined work.

Before developing competency models for enhanced project delivery, the organization must recognize its core strengths and understand the requirements needed to succeed in its business endeavors. This includes understanding the complexities and risks associated with the projects they deliver. While most executives focus on the final installed costs to determine if the project should be executed, other factors should be considered. For instance, is the organization experienced in designing or constructing the project (i.e., qualified resources)? Does the organization have the understanding and ability to perform different project delivery strategies (design-bid-build, design-build, etc.) and contract types (time and material, firm price, etc.)? Is the project introducing any new technology the organization has not executed before? Is the delivery of the project urgent and a priority? Is the project critical (and vital) for the organization to meet its business objectives? Does the project need to be delivered in a compressed time frame? Are there major contractor interfaces and logistical coordination requirements? Finally, are there any significant uncertainties and constraints?

Understanding these factors allows the organization to determine the required competencies and scale its operations accordingly. For more complex and riskier projects, you will require advanced technical skills, knowledge, and experience to administer the project to a favorable outcome. For projects with minimal complexity and risks, the organization may choose to reduce its oversight (administration) and surveillance (observation).

For owner organizations, it has been identified that approximately 1 to 3 percent of the TIC costs of the project are dedicated toward the project control efforts. Projects with more complexity and significant risks may require more experience and oversight (3%), while simple projects may require less (1%). Please note that while the top-down estimating approach provides the basis for determining budgets and resources, the project team should support the development of the Class 3 estimate with a bottom-up, deliverable-based estimate as defined by the project controls scope of work and requirements.

Competency

Once the organization has defined the type of project work that it wants to engage in, as a first step, it can now define the desired enterprise capabilities, as illustrated in Figure 1. This diagram itemizes the primary elements required to support the implementation of the overall competency models for management, which further supports their employees and their development. Without these attributes, introducing practical competencies will be challenging.

Figure 1 – Enterprise Capabilities

Organizational Competency:

With the enterprise capabilities defined, the organization can begin establishing the taxonomy of the organizational competency. When defining organizational competency, it must identify the corporate and functional project mandates that support the overall business strategy. The organization should also define its vision and mission statements, executive directives, and key performance indicators (KPI). Subsequently, the organization must establish its required project management and project controls standard practices, processes, templates, and tools to provide the appropriate monitoring levels, controls, and project reporting. These standard practices must be functionally adequate and assessed against approved standards, preferably best practices known to produce favorable outcomes. Figure 2 provides an example of the hierarchy of deliverables that define and support organizational competency. The introduction and adherence to this hierarchy will provide the appropriate level of awareness of the health of the project and organization.

Figure 2 – Project Controls Taxonomy
 

When establishing the business norms for operating a project delivery model, the organization will be required to provide the appropriate context and governance for applying any policies, procedures, and processes. An organization cannot be successful if it does not ensure compliance with these requirements. The policies, procedures, and processes are written to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the organization, as well as improve the timeliness of decision-making and problem-solving. Finally, by ensuring compliance, the organization can identify and mitigate enterprise, portfolio, and project risks. Policies, procedures, and processes are written to protect the organization’s interests, not to obstruct the membership of the organization nor the delivery of the project. Organizations may want to reference AACE’s Total Cost Management Framework and associated recommended practices to develop organizational competencies.

Employee Competency:

Another failing aspect of some organizations is the lack of defined roles, responsibilities, and expectations. This, in turn, affects the required competencies of the organization’s employees. If they do not know what to do, don’t expect them to do it. Worse yet, expect them to do the wrong thing. The organization must define clear and concise competencies for each of its roles within the project controls environment. These competencies should be observable abilities, skills, and knowledge of specific areas of the project controls domain. This also includes the motivations, traits, and behaviors needed to perform the job successfully. For the organization to further develop the competencies of its employees, a competency development program should be introduced. Organizations will need to consider the following:

  • The scope of work for each core service or targeted area is based on the pre-defined organization competencies.
  • Identify the needs for each specific discipline within the category, including:
    • Level of effort for each discipline (risk vs. reward).
    • Interfaces between disciplines and coordination activities (integration).
  • Define the level of skill required for each assigned task and assign the appropriate skill category.
    • Assign entry-level staff to less technical tasks.
    • Assign a more experienced resource mix for highly technical /risky /complex scopes of work.
  • Once these items have been defined, determine the gaps where enhancements can be introduced.
    • Introduce appropriate training seminars/events.
    • Promote team members to participate in practice groups or academic societies that improve competencies.
    • Introduce train-the-trainer as well as mentorship programs.
    • Introduce an apprenticeship program that advances staff through organized education.
  • If staff is unavailable, the organization will need to partner (contract) with a 3rd party organization to provide the required services.

Another suggestion for employees to improve their competencies is to achieve professional certifications from reputable organizations. These certifications promote a level of professionalism, expertise, and credibility. The following list identifies specific industry-relevant certifications education institutions offer within the project delivery domain.

  • Certified Cost Professional (CCP) – AACE International
  • Planning Scheduling Professional (PSP) – AACE International
  • Earned Value Professional (EVP) – AACE International
  • Certified Estimating Professional (CEP) – AACE International
  • Decision and Risk Management Professional (DRMP) – AACE International
  • Project Risk Management Professional (PRMP) – AACE International
  • Certified Forensic Claims Consultant (CFCC) – AACE International
  • Certified Supply Chain Professional (CSCP) – The Association for Supply Chain Management or Supply Chain Management Professional (SCMP) – Supply Chain Canada
  • Certified Value Specialist (CVS) – SAVE International
  • Project Management Professional (PMP) – Project Management Institute

For a project team member to be effective in their role, the organization needs to ensure these individuals have the capability and availability (for the role’s complexity), aptitude, skills and knowledge, and commitment to, and value of, the work required of this role. Organizations may want to introduce scalability (levels) to their defined roles, i.e., junior, intermediate, senior scheduler, estimator, etc. Organizations may also want to reference AACE’s recommended practice, RP 11R-88, Required Skills and Knowledge of Cost Engineering. AACE offers other skills and knowledge RPs for other functions under the cost engineering domain.

Level of Effort Based on Assigned Deliverables and Phase Gates:

As discussed earlier, knowing the required level of effort and when an organization is required to unleash these competencies is equally important. No one wants to attend the dance late (or even too early). To methodically complete the execution of deliverables, organizations should introduce a phase-gate process. This approach promotes the timely release of required documents so that information is available to support effective problem-solving, decision-making, approval(s), and advancement.

A phase-gate process is a project life cycle technique in which an initiative or project (e.g., new product development, software development, process improvement, business change) is divided into distinct phases or stages, separated by assessment and decision points (control gates). For some users, especially owner companies, the phase-gating process is considered a go, no-go decision-making model where the continuation of the project is decided by managers, steering committees, or governance boards (at each control gate). It also enforces that the project teams will apply the required quality when developing the deliverables as well as ensure the maturing of the scope of work as it passes through the gates (deliverables are assigned to each phase, which are either completed in the phase or are further developed as the project moves through the phases). Figure 3 illustrates the typical phase gate for the process industry that an owner company may use. In this example, the phase gate is separated into two sections: front-end loading (FEL) and execution. Conceptual and semi-detailed engineering occurs during the FEL phases. Once FEL is complete, the project team usually receives full funding to move the project forward. Once funding has been approved, execution of the project occurs, where detailed design (engineering), procurement, and construction activities ensue.

Figure 3 – Typical Phase Gating ArrowProcess Industry

As stated earlier, project controls deliverables are assigned to each phase to ensure that the expectations are being met when required, as illustrated in Table 1. The table identifies the element in which the deliverable is assigned and the required maturity (level of completeness) of the deliverable (preliminary (P), detailed (D), or updated (U)). For a comprehensive list of project controls deliverables, please reference AACE’s RP 60R-10, Developing the Project Controls Plan.

Table 1 – Phase Gate Assignment of the Deliverables for the Six Elements of Project Controls

Completing the work during the designated timeframe is crucial to project success and ensures that the desired competencies and expectations are met without redundancy, overlap, or gaps. This also promotes healthy behaviors in developing and managing project expectations. If completed appropriately, the project team can then understand the level and distribution of these efforts, as illustrated in Figure 4. This further allows project teams to plan resources accordingly and properly administer the work to be completed.

Figure 4 – Level of Effort and Distribution – Proposed State

Figure 4 illustrates the level of effort. Element 1, knowing what has to be done, consumes approximately 20% of the total project and controls overall effort. Element 2, knowing what has been done, consumes approximately 10%, etc. The timing of effort graph illustrates the distribution of the effort for each element over the project life cycle. As illustrated, most of Element 1’s efforts (15% of the 20%) are concentrated in the planning (FEL) phase, while the remaining efforts for Element 1 (5% of the 20%) are being performed during the execution phase. This portion of effort for Element 1 allows the project controls team to update and re-plan (if necessary) the project based on the performance of delivery, changes to the project, the re-assessment of risks, and forecasting the final outcome. The remaining elements (2 through 6) are performed entirely during the execution phase. The level of effort and distribution over time allows organizations to estimate the costs of the project controls team.

To demonstrate the calculation for determining the costs of the project controls efforts, the following example is provided. A company was required to install an interconnecting piping system to an existing facility. The total installed cost (TIC) of the project was estimated at $11.810 MM. This new interconnect piping system would allow a different feedstock to be introduced into the facility. The FEL phases would take four months to execute, while the detailed engineering and construction period was expected to take eight months. For this project, it was determined that it was highly complex and had significant risks, and therefore, it was identified that 3 percent of the TIC costs should be dedicated towards the project controls efforts. With this said, the project controls budget was set at $354,300, of which 15% ($53,145) was allocated to manage the FEL phases. The remaining funds of $301,155 were used to manage the execution portion of the project (home office engineering and field construction). Table 2 illustrates the budget components of the project, the percentage of TIC, estimated hours, and full-time equivalents (FTEs) of required personnel. The organization now has a budget that supports the required competency and level of effort at which to perform the project controls duties.

Table 2 – Project Controls Budget for the Interconnect Piping System Project

Figure 5 illustrates the cash flow projection for project controls for the example project. It displays both the cash flow and FTE requirements for the project life cycle.

Figure 5 – Project Controls Cash Flow

Going through the motions and simulating project controls efforts will only create negativity and minimize the functionality and value this profession brings to project delivery. Compound this issue with ill timing, and the results could be disastrous. Therefore, applying the correct competencies for the organization and its employees is essential. The success of using these competencies is also predicated on the level of effort and the timing of these efforts. The Six Elements of Project Controls, complemented with these competencies, further provide the organization with an objective approach to ensure project success.

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2024/01/22/part-4-six-elements-of-project-controls-competency-and-level-of-effort/feed/ 0
In Memoriam, January 2024 https://source.aacei.org/2024/01/12/in-memoriam-january-2024/ https://source.aacei.org/2024/01/12/in-memoriam-january-2024/#respond Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:10:14 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=9039

In Memoriam

Anthony J. (Tony) Werderitsch, PE CCP CFCC FAACE Hon. Life

June 19, 1941 – January 7, 2024

Previous slide
Next slide

Anthony J. Werderitsch (Tony) passed away peacefully at home in the early morning hours of January 7, 2024, with his beloved wife, Patricia, at his side, after suffering from pneumonia and a lengthy battle with cancer (bladder, skin, and soft tissue sarcoma). Tony had full mental acumen up until his passing and fought death every step of the way.

Anthony was born June 19, 1941, in Chicago, Illinois. He attended Saint Patrick’s All Boy’s School, playing offensive guard on the varsity football team, and fell in love with his sweetheart, Patricia (Pat). He was looking forward to celebrating their 60thwedding anniversary later this month. Tony attended Marquette University in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where he earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering, was a proud member of the Triangle Fraternity, and was active in the Army ROTC program his first year.

During his long and successful career, Tony’s family relocated 13 times. He started his career with Bethlehem Steel in Pennsylvania as a “looper” (i.e., Bethlehem’s management training program, where one makes a loop around all company operations). Tony loved to travel, so he took a job as a cost engineer in San Francisco, California, with Bechtel Corporation, a large engineering and construction company building power plants worldwide, and Tony went to many of them.

After traveling and moving, the family got homesick and relocated to Jackson, Michigan, where Tony became a project controls manager with Commonwealth Associates. While there, Tony petitioned the state to identify Jackson, Michigan, as the home of astronaut Al Worden. The state agreed and subsequently installed signs along the highways.

On one vacation to Disney World, Tony happened to stop and fill out an employment application. The next thing we knew, the family was moving to Orlando, where he became the project engineer of what was then called Lake Buena Vista (now known as Disney Springs). He played golf in the 1972 Disney Pro-Am with David Heartman and Bill Graham behind Jack Nickalaus’s foursome.

The oil embargo hit Disney, and they wanted Tony to move back to California. He was not going back to California, so the family decided on Ann Arbor, Michigan, where he was the project controls manager at Townsend and Bottum. At that point in his career, Tony started his own company. He asked Pat to join him in this endeavor, and thus, Administrative Controls Management, Inc. opened its doors on March 1, 1985. ACM now has offices in Charlotte, North Carolina; Westerville, Ohio; and Detroit, Michigan. The headquarters office remains in Ann Arbor.

Tony enjoyed playing racquetball in his younger years, going on long walks in his older years, playing cards with friends and family, dancing, and singing karaoke. He was a member of Ann Arbor Golf and Outing and Polo Fields Golf and Country Club, where he played in the summers, as well as Hideaway Country Club in Fort Myers, Florida, where he could continue the second love of his life, golf, in the winters. Tony won the 1996 Father/Son Golf Classic in Pebble Beach, California, and many friendly competitions, including two Old Hickories and Three Maloy Cups at Ann Arbor Golf and Outing.

Tony was a smart, generous, and caring man who gave of his time and talents to many. He was a beloved mentor to many in the project controls profession and spent many years serving AACE International and with various Kiwanis clubs of Ann Arbor. He was sought after internationally to present on project controls. He was able to travel to England, the Middle East, and Poland to name a few.

Tony is survived by his loving and devoted wife and partner, Patricia; sons, Anthony and Andrew (Anna); grandsons, Joseph, Cypress, and Cosimo; sisters Barbara Andersen of Chicago, Illinois, and Janet Alexander of Placitas, New Mexico; several nieces and nephews; as well as numerous other family members and cherished friends.

Funeral Arrangements

Friends and Family will be received at Nie Funeral Home – Liberty Road Chapel (3767 W. Liberty Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48103) for a visitation Tuesday, January 16, from 4-7 p.m. Visitation will also take place Wednesday, January 17 from 10 a.m. until the time of Funeral Mass at 11 a.m. at St. Andrew the Apostle Catholic Church (910 Austin Drive, Saline, MI 48176).

In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions can be made to St. Andrew the Apostle Catholic Church.

Tony’s AACE International History

Tony has been an active member of AACE International since 1971. As noted, Tony had served as ACM’s executive vice president, owner, and co-founder. He had over five decades of experience in project management consulting, major engineering, and construction projects. His professional responsibilities have entailed corporate project management oversight and operations and working as a departmental manager for project controls, estimating, planning, scheduling, and cost analysis. Tony co-authored ACM’s Construction Claims: Contract Changes, Contract Delays, and Claim Awareness; Project Management Planning & Scheduling; Planning & Scheduling; and Fundamentals of Cost Estimating training seminars. Tony has written and presented many papers to professional societies and industry associations, has served as an expert witness in construction delay claims, and was one of ACM’s key professional instructors.

The first AACE International technical paper Tony authored/co-authored was in 1983. He was also involved with Skills & Knowledge sessions doing presentations/workshops and continuing education classes. He taught/co-taught for AACE for a span of at least 30+ years from the time of his first technical paper presentation. He also had been active (especially in earlier years) and supportive of the Great Lakes Section of AACE.

Tony’s company, Administrative Controls Management, Inc. (ACM), was the 2006 recipient of the Industry Appreciation Award (at that time Industrial Appreciation Award). ACM was also the first Approved Education Provider (AEP), which Tony and Pat were quite proud of.

The last AACE award Tony received was in 2016. At that time, it was noted that he had 40 years of experience in major engineering and construction projects; he had assisted in the education of thousands of corporate, government, institutional, and associations representatives. He was a registered Professional Engineer (PE) and held the AACE designations of Certified Cost Professional (CCP) and Certified Forensic Claims Consultant (CFCC). He has written and presented numerous papers to professional groups and industries about total cost management (TCM) as an expert on construction delay claims. Tony was previously honored by AACE as a Fellow (1987), Honorary Life Membership (1995), the O.T. Zimmerman Founder’s Award (2004), the Award of Merit (2015), and the Brian D. Dunfield Educational Service Award (2016).

Tony’s contributions to AACE International will be greatly missed. 

AACE International Member Remembrances

Past AACE President Clive D. Francis, CCP FAACE (served as President in 2004-2005), said: “Anthony Werderitsch and I met in 1970 when he came to work at what was then Commonwealth Associates in Jackson, MI. I was just a young guy barely six months out of college and very green in estimating. Our boss had hired me to be one of the “kids” in the estimating department. Tony followed him from another company, and he was the senior guy in the plan to build a quality estimating department at Commonwealth.”

Clive continued, “I was assigned to work with Tony, and more importantly, he became my first mentor. He took this “kid” and began the arduous task of teaching me the estimating profession. He had the patience of Job as he taught me so much from the actual work to being able to present the estimate to the client and defend it.” Clive adds, “Tony championed the development of a computerized estimating system for Commonwealth Associates, and I was along for the adventure. A point to understand is that the computer was in the basement in those early days and occupied most of the floor space there. Tony persisted, and the system became a major tool for use on our larger power plant projects. The ability to select and print data was a great boon to preparing an analysis for the estimate.”

In conclusion, Clive says, “I will always remember Tony as my first mentor, a mentorship which lasted many years. He provided guidance and gave me a solid basis of knowledge and work skills that served me well in my career progression. I will also remember Tony as my friend, a person I could sit with and talk about the job or just spend time talking about nothing. Tony’s contributions to AACE are many and varied. His support of the local section was never questioned. At the national level, his many contributions can be seen when you open the Skills and Knowledge of Cost Engineering or any other publications. He made many presentations at the national level, and more importantly, he could be called upon to fill a gap in the program. 

I will miss my mentor and friend.”

Douglas W. Leo, CCP CEP, said, “Sad news indeed, what a gentleman. Tony will be missed.”

Larry R. Dysert, CCP CEP DRMP FAACE Hon. Life, said, “I am saddened by the passing of Tony Werderitsch. Tony’s contributions to AACE and cost engineering have significantly enhanced our profession. Always approachable and supportive, his mentorship of those within his professional realm positioned them for professional success.  Many will miss him, and I extend my condolences to his family, professional colleagues, and friends.”

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2024/01/12/in-memoriam-january-2024/feed/ 0
New Member Profile: Chris Howells https://source.aacei.org/2024/01/09/new-member-profile-chris-howells/ https://source.aacei.org/2024/01/09/new-member-profile-chris-howells/#respond Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:55:41 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=9010

Meet Chris Howells

Where are you from, and where did you go to school?

With my dad taking on various assignments with the Army Corps of Engineers worldwide, I lived in many places, so I can’t call a specific place home. I’ve lived in South Korea, Japan, New York (where I was born), Los Angeles, and San Francisco (where I completed high school). I completed my BS in Physics at San Francisco State University and my MS in Engineering Physics at George Mason University.

What’s something about you (a fun fact) that not many people know?

I’m a Nuclear Medical Science officer in the U.S. Army Reserve and have been in for about 21 years. In this capacity, I protect service members from nuclear radiation exposure. Although the Army Reserve is a part-time job, I’ve made a great career out of it. I plan to retire from the Army Reserve next year.

Also, not many people know that I hold an AACE CEP certification.

Where do you work?

I work (full-time) at the US Department of Energy in the Office of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). In this occupation, I’m a federal cost analyst and lead the development of independent cost estimates for capital projects and life extension programs that support the nuclear security enterprise.

What do you love most about your job?

I get to work on challenging and unique projects that serve an important role in safeguarding national security through the application of nuclear science.

Do you have a project story to share?

Scope growth has been a topic of interest at the NNSA because projects have historically tended to cost more than they were estimated to cost early on. A work-in-progress is currently going on to understand better how project scope can grow and thus increase the total project cost over time.

What are your future goals and aspirations for your career? Did someone inspire you to be on this career path?

My future goals would be to learn the R and Python programming languages, which are good for processing and analyzing large data sets. I believe that as cost data increases, learning to use the tools capable of processing massive amounts of data will be necessary. MS Excel is great but, unfortunately, has some limits on processing large datasets.

I became a cost analyst by accident, whereas before that, I was a physical scientist for the Army (as a federal civilian) in the 2000s. My office at that time was impacted by the Base Realignment Closure Act of 2005, a congressionally authorized process to increase the efficiency of the US Department of Defense. As a result, that office was slated to move to a new location about 65 miles away from where I live in Washington, DC. I could not handle a four-hour daily commute, so I applied for other jobs closer to my residence and was hired as a cost analyst for another Army office. I remained a cost analyst since 2009 and served in this capacity through three other federal agencies – the Department of Navy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Energy. I’ve enjoyed being a cost analyst ever since.

What is the biggest career challenge you’ve had to overcome? What’s been your favorite or most memorable moment of your career?

My biggest challenge was learning to complete Earned Value Management (EVM) analysis on projects and brief the results simply so that all stakeholders can understand where a project is on cost and schedule. The concepts of EVM, such as Budgeted Cost for Work Performed and Budgeted Cost for Work Scheduled, can initially be abstract, but through some training and good mentorship, this abstraction can easily be overcome.

The most memorable moment in my career was temporarily exiting my cost analyst career due to a military deployment. I was deployed to the Middle East for about nine months, where I had to complete radiation safety audits and x-ray surveys at various forward operation bases across the Middle East. This deployment resulted in travels to many parts of the Middle East, where I visited Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan, Afghanistan, and Iraq. My office at the time (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) was very supportive during my deployment, making my time in the Middle East easier.

Why did you join AACE?

I joined AACE to gain access to its many cost-estimating resources and obtain the latest news in the cost-estimating community. I joined believing access to this information would help me (or anyone) become a better cost analyst.

What do you like most about being an AACE member? Or What’s your favorite part of being an AACE member?

Members can access many of AACE’s cost-estimating best practices at no cost and receive discounts on AACE-sponsored conferences, seminars, and certification exam fees.

What advice would you give to someone who wants to enter the field?

Ask questions about the project you are estimating. If you are not good at asking questions, I offer another piece of advice – take some time to think about the project you are estimating, and good questions should come naturally. Asking good questions about the project will help you better plan your estimating process and develop a more defensible cost estimate. I’ve also found that asking good questions generally helps avoid future problems arising when you plan to do anything. E.g., remodeling your home or going on vacation in a strange place.

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2024/01/09/new-member-profile-chris-howells/feed/ 0
An Engineer, a Project Manager, a Professor, and a Claims Expert https://source.aacei.org/2023/12/26/an-engineer-a-project-manager-a-professor-and-a-claims-expert/ https://source.aacei.org/2023/12/26/an-engineer-a-project-manager-a-professor-and-a-claims-expert/#comments Tue, 26 Dec 2023 06:00:00 +0000 https://source.aacei.org/?p=8981

An Engineer, a Project Manager, a Professor, and a Claims Expert

How Dr. Rania Fayed persevered to be the best of the best in her field

What has motivated you to venture into engineering studies?

I grew up in an engineering family. My father and an older brother are civil engineers, and another older brother is an architect. The family owns and operates an engineering contractor business in Egypt and the United Arab Emirates. I have always been intrigued by their conversations about engineering problems and construction issues. As the younger daughter of the family, I wanted to be included in those conversations and contribute to their problem-solving. That’s why I decided to study engineering at the university!

How did your family feel about your decision?

In the beginning, my father was worried. “Why not choose a ‘softer’ discipline?” Fathers are always worried about their daughters; they don’t want them to have to work too hard, and they don’t want them to get dirty in the field or be in industries where historically there was a gender imbalance. But in the end, I told him that engineering runs in my blood and I needed to pursue something I love. My dedication won him over. I ranked at the top of the class year after year throughout my undergraduate years to prove to everyone that I had made the right decision.

You chose project controls as your specialty after your undergraduate studies. How did you end up selecting that trajectory?

After I graduated, my education earned me a place in my father’s contractor business. He became my compass and my anchor from then on. My father had always told me that to be a good engineer, you need to be on the perpetual path of learning to understand all aspects of the business – including how projects are planned, how they should be budgeted, how costs are managed, and how contracts are negotiated. So, I joined the project controls department of the company!

 My father’s other advice was, “Don’t know the answer? Ask, read, search, and learn!”  That’s what I did. I started my master’s degree in construction management, with concentrated studies in planning and cost management while working. After learning the ropes at the company, I quickly became immersed in the thoughts of how I could improve the business and make things more efficient. I snuck into my father’s library to read all his books on cost control. Then, I decided to build an extensive cost database to estimate and tender contracts faster and more accurately! I reveled in the responsibility I was given, and I loved that I contributed to the company being more profitable!

You have also decided to further your studies by pursuing a doctorate degree in construction management. What prompted that decision, and how did that change your career?

Furthering my studies was part passion and part need. I love to solve problems. At the same time, the more projects you work on, the more you realize what you don’t know. Around the early 2010s, I worked on several power plant and electrical substation projects. These projects opened up the world of “contract management” to me, from contract development to stakeholder management, and claims management. I decided to pursue a Ph.D. at the American University in Cairo and ultimately focused my research on simulation and optimization modeling to construct civil works for electrical substations.

Soon after my Ph.D., I also became a professor at the Kafr El-Sheikh University, teaching construction management. Teaching was rewarding as it allowed me to share my passion for construction management with my students! I also believed I had a responsibility to help the undergraduates and my post-graduate students, just like how my father guided me.

After you got your doctorate, you decided to leave the family business. How did your family react to that?

My father was opposed to me leaving the family business. As a protective and loving father, he wanted his daughter to be kept under his wings. However, my mother helped convince him that allowing me to work elsewhere was a great learning opportunity. Working outside the family business was a tough transition, but the joy of learning for different management firms and the plethora of projects out there was a tremendously rewarding experience.

What is one of the biggest highlights of your career, in your opinion?

Professionally, my current position as a contracts manager at Hill International Inc. is a position that brings joy to me every day. Hill International is a global construction consultant firm, and this opened a new horizon of unique and exciting projects for me, including the Grand Egyptian Museum and the Monorail. It is a supportive company for me as a woman in the field of project control and gave me excellent opportunities to learn and develop.

From a personal perspective, I would have to say obtaining my Master of Laws degree in 2023 is a big highlight. As a part of the family contractor business, we were always just the initiator of claims. If I could understand the “other side” of a claim, I would have a comprehensive view of contract arbitration and adjudication! As a contract manager, I’m still constantly learning from different contracts from different disciplines, court rulings, and industry lessons learned. With all the education and experience I’ve received, I was able to look for the most optimal win-win solution for the engineer, the project manager, and the contractor – all the roles in which I have gained first-hand experience.

What advice would you give to women considering a path in construction management, project controls, or claims dispute?

I will relay the best advice I have received from my father, who, to this day, is still my lighthouse in my career and my life. He told me always to seek opportunities and try new things, even though deep inside, I feel I may not be qualified for that role. Take the challenge, learn, and persevere.

Let the quality of your work speak for you. Start writing papers as an undergraduate because writing down your thoughts logically, and don’t be afraid to get feedback from experts in the field as it is one of the best ways to learn. I always encourage my students to familiarize themselves with best practices and attend and present at AACE events to “ask, read, search, and learn!” 

           

Rania Fayed, Ph.D., LLM, MSc, FCIArb, PMP, is an experienced construction management professional working at Hill International Inc. in Egypt. She is the vice president of the AACE Egypt Section and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) liaison for the AACE Women in Project Controls committee.

]]>
https://source.aacei.org/2023/12/26/an-engineer-a-project-manager-a-professor-and-a-claims-expert/feed/ 2